OmniVoice-StudiovsOpencast
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OmniVoice-Studio | Opencast | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #38 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 93 560 | 509 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +58 286 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 | 12 |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | 20.5 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | ECL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 57/100 for Opencast, so it is the safer default.
OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Opencast.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; Opencast needs more configuration.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 286 stars in 30 days).
OmniVoice-Studio details →Opencast details →
Swap a project
Keep OmniVoice-Studio, compare it with
Keep Opencast, compare it with