OmniToolsvsSandBase Harness
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OmniTools | SandBase Harness | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 166 in Developer Tools | #170 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 10 487 | 635 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +244 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 9 |
| Latest release | v0.7.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | v0.3.8 · 30 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OmniTools scores 71/100 against 39/100 for SandBase Harness, so it is the safer default.
SandBase Harness ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OmniTools.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniTools is easier to run; SandBase Harness needs more configuration.
OmniTools is growing faster right now (+244 stars in 30 days).
OmniTools details →SandBase Harness details →