OmniToolsvsrebacklogs
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OmniTools | rebacklogs | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 166 in Developer Tools | #36 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 490 | 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +247 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.7.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | v4.3.3 · 6 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
OmniTools scores 71/100 against 43/100 for rebacklogs, so it is the safer default.
rebacklogs ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OmniTools.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniTools is easier to run; rebacklogs needs more configuration.
OmniTools is growing faster right now (+247 stars in 30 days).
OmniTools details →rebacklogs details →