OmniRoutevsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OmniRoute | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 82 107 | 89 717 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 091 | +2 428 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 17 |
| Latest release | radar-export-latest · 20 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OmniRoute scores 88/100 against 86/100 for World Monitor, so it is the safer default.
World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OmniRoute.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniRoute is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.
OmniRoute details →World Monitor details →
Swap a project
Keep OmniRoute, compare it with
Keep World Monitor, compare it with