OmniRoutevsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OmniRoute | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 82 151 | 117 750 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 135 | +5 391 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 11 |
| Latest release | radar-export-latest · 20 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OmniRoute scores 88/100 against 86/100 for TradingAgents, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OmniRoute.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniRoute is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
OmniRoute details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep OmniRoute, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with