OmniRoutevsFerrite Telegram Server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OmniRoute | Ferrite Telegram Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #88 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 82 212 | 177 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 196 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | radar-export-latest · 20 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | C# |
Which one should you pick?
OmniRoute scores 88/100 against 39/100 for Ferrite Telegram Server, so it is the safer default.
OmniRoute ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Ferrite Telegram Server.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniRoute is easier to run; Ferrite Telegram Server needs more configuration.
OmniRoute is growing faster right now (+3 196 stars in 30 days).
OmniRoute details →Ferrite Telegram Server details →
Swap a project
Keep OmniRoute, compare it with
Keep Ferrite Telegram Server, compare it with