OmniRoutevsspeech-to-phrase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OmniRoute | speech-to-phrase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #6 of 11 in Voice Assistants |
| GitHub stars | 82 212 | 348 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 196 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 2 |
| Latest release | radar-export-latest · 20 Oct 2026 | v1.4.3 · 3 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OmniRoute scores 88/100 against 46/100 for speech-to-phrase, so it is the safer default.
OmniRoute ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for speech-to-phrase.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniRoute is easier to run; speech-to-phrase needs more configuration.
OmniRoute is growing faster right now (+3 196 stars in 30 days).
OmniRoute details →speech-to-phrase details →
Swap a project
Keep OmniRoute, compare it with
Keep speech-to-phrase, compare it with