openclawvsspeech-to-phrase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openclaw | speech-to-phrase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 125 in AI | #6 of 11 in Voice Assistants |
| GitHub stars | 393 278 | 348 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 930 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 2 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.4.3 · 3 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 46/100 for speech-to-phrase, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for speech-to-phrase.
If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; speech-to-phrase needs more configuration.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 930 stars in 30 days).
openclaw details →speech-to-phrase details →
Swap a project
Keep openclaw, compare it with
Keep speech-to-phrase, compare it with