OmniRoutevsOTOBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OmniRoute | OTOBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #5 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 82 304 | 338 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 288 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 2 |
| Latest release | radar-export-latest · 20 Oct 2026 | rel-11_0_15 · 4 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Perl |
Which one should you pick?
OmniRoute scores 88/100 against 54/100 for OTOBO, so it is the safer default.
OmniRoute ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for OTOBO.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniRoute is easier to run; OTOBO needs more configuration.
OmniRoute is growing faster right now (+3 288 stars in 30 days).
OmniRoute details →OTOBO details →
Swap a project
Keep OmniRoute, compare it with
Keep OTOBO, compare it with