OJSvsunopim
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OJS | unopim | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 2 in Publishing | #1 of 6 in Product Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 046 | 11 046 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +47 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 17 |
| Latest release | — | v3.1.3 · 29 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
unopim scores 69/100 against 62/100 for OJS, so it is the safer default.
unopim ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for OJS.
If you want the quickest setup, unopim is easier to run; OJS needs more configuration.
unopim is growing faster right now (+47 stars in 30 days).
Swap a project
Keep OJS, compare it with
Keep unopim, compare it with