OctoBotvsOwncast
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OctoBot | Owncast | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency | #1 of 4 in Live Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 6 872 | 11 632 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +257 | +76 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 3 |
| Latest release | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 | v0.3.0 · 2 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Owncast scores 73/100 against 69/100 for OctoBot, so it is the safer default.
OctoBot ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Owncast.
If you want the quickest setup, Owncast is easier to run; OctoBot needs more configuration.
OctoBot is growing faster right now (+257 stars in 30 days).
OctoBot details →Owncast details →
Swap a project
Keep OctoBot, compare it with
Keep Owncast, compare it with