octo-servervsTypebot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| octo-server | Typebot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #37 of 110 in Chat | #1 of 6 in Chatbot |
| GitHub stars | 1 101 | 10 585 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +224 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.24.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | v3.19.1 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Typebot scores 70/100 against 53/100 for octo-server, so it is the safer default.
octo-server ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Typebot.
If you want the quickest setup, Typebot is easier to run; octo-server needs more configuration.
Typebot is growing faster right now (+224 stars in 30 days).
octo-server details →Typebot details →
Swap a project
Keep octo-server, compare it with
Keep Typebot, compare it with