ObscuravsUrocissa
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Obscura | Urocissa | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 16 in Web Scraping | #11 of 19 in Photo Galleries |
| GitHub stars | 29 561 | 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +477 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 18 |
| Latest release | v0.2.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | 3.4.2 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Obscura scores 75/100 against 48/100 for Urocissa, so it is the safer default.
Urocissa ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Obscura.
If you want the quickest setup, Obscura is easier to run; Urocissa needs more configuration.
Obscura is growing faster right now (+477 stars in 30 days).
Obscura details →Urocissa details →
Swap a project
Keep Obscura, compare it with
Keep Urocissa, compare it with