o-spreadsheetvsText Generation WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| o-spreadsheet | Text Generation WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 10 in Data Management | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 297 | 47 724 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 10 |
| Latest release | 20.0.5 · 28 Oct 2026 | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 49/100 for o-spreadsheet, so it is the safer default.
o-spreadsheet ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Text Generation WebUI.
If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; o-spreadsheet needs more configuration.
Text Generation WebUI is growing faster right now (+17 stars in 30 days).
o-spreadsheet details →Text Generation WebUI details →
Swap a project
Keep o-spreadsheet, compare it with
Keep Text Generation WebUI, compare it with