o-spreadsheetvsSearXNG
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| o-spreadsheet | SearXNG | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 10 in Data Management | #1 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 297 | 38 961 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 395 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 0 |
| Latest release | 20.0.5 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
SearXNG scores 86/100 against 49/100 for o-spreadsheet, so it is the safer default.
o-spreadsheet ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for SearXNG.
If you want the quickest setup, SearXNG is easier to run; o-spreadsheet needs more configuration.
SearXNG is growing faster right now (+1 395 stars in 30 days).
o-spreadsheet details →SearXNG details →
Swap a project
Keep o-spreadsheet, compare it with
Keep SearXNG, compare it with