o-spreadsheetvsopen-wearables
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| o-spreadsheet | open-wearables | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 10 in Data Management | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness |
| GitHub stars | 297 | 2 727 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +172 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 16 |
| Latest release | 20.0.5 · 28 Oct 2026 | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
open-wearables scores 63/100 against 49/100 for o-spreadsheet, so it is the safer default.
open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for o-spreadsheet.
If you want the quickest setup, open-wearables is easier to run; o-spreadsheet needs more configuration.
open-wearables is growing faster right now (+172 stars in 30 days).
o-spreadsheet details →open-wearables details →
Swap a project
Keep o-spreadsheet, compare it with
Keep open-wearables, compare it with