o-spreadsheetvsOmniVoice-Studio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| o-spreadsheet | OmniVoice-Studio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 94/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 10 in Data Management | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 297 | 93 082 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +57 808 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 35 |
| Latest release | 20.0.5 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 49/100 for o-spreadsheet, so it is the safer default.
OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for o-spreadsheet.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; o-spreadsheet needs more configuration.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 808 stars in 30 days).
o-spreadsheet details →OmniVoice-Studio details →
Swap a project
Keep o-spreadsheet, compare it with
Keep OmniVoice-Studio, compare it with