npsvsQtap
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| nps | Qtap | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 31 in Networking | #21 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 34 266 | 1 465 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +31 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | C |
Which one should you pick?
nps scores 74/100 against 51/100 for Qtap, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, nps is easier to run; Qtap needs more configuration.
nps is growing faster right now (+31 stars in 30 days).