npsvsopenHop Repeater
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| nps | openHop Repeater | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 31 in Networking | #2 of 10 in Network |
| GitHub stars | 34 263 | 298 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +30 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 |
| Latest release | — | 1.1.4 · 8 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
nps scores 74/100 against 51/100 for openHop Repeater, so it is the safer default.
openHop Repeater ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for nps.
If you want the quickest setup, nps is easier to run; openHop Repeater needs more configuration.
nps is growing faster right now (+30 stars in 30 days).
nps details →openHop Repeater details →