NovuvsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Novu | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in Notifications | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 40 220 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +160 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 0 |
| Latest release | @novu/framework@v2.14.0 · 28 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Novu scores 76/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
Novu ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
If you want the quickest setup, Uptime-Kuma-Web-API is easier to run; Novu needs more configuration.
Novu is growing faster right now (+160 stars in 30 days).
Novu details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep Novu, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with