norishvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| norish | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 18 in Recipe Management | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 1 424 | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +196 | +103 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Zammad scores 70/100 against 61/100 for norish, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, norish is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
norish details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep norish, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with