norishvsOpenEats
Two self-hosted Recipe Management projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| norish | OpenEats | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 18 in Recipe Management | #10 of 18 in Recipe Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 424 | 696 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +196 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Dockerfile |
Which one should you pick?
norish scores 61/100 against 47/100 for OpenEats, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, norish is easier to run; OpenEats needs more configuration.
norish is growing faster right now (+196 stars in 30 days).
norish details →OpenEats details →All Recipe Management projects →
Swap a project
Keep norish, compare it with
Keep OpenEats, compare it with