nopcommercevsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| nopcommerce | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #11 of 27 in E-commerce | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 10 169 | 93 040 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +14 | +1 293 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 19 |
| Latest release | release-5.00.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 68/100 for nopcommerce, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for nopcommerce.
If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; nopcommerce needs more configuration.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 293 stars in 30 days).
nopcommerce details →uptime-kuma details →
Swap a project
Keep nopcommerce, compare it with
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with