Nomadvsyoutube-dl-server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Nomad | youtube-dl-server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #31 of 45 in Download Management |
| GitHub stars | 17 057 | 319 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +84 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.1.1 · 29 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Nomad scores 77/100 against 47/100 for youtube-dl-server, so it is the safer default.
Nomad ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for youtube-dl-server.
If you want the quickest setup, youtube-dl-server is easier to run; Nomad needs more configuration.
Nomad is growing faster right now (+84 stars in 30 days).
Nomad details →youtube-dl-server details →
Swap a project
Keep Nomad, compare it with
Keep youtube-dl-server, compare it with