Nomadvsvoidaccess
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Nomad | voidaccess | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #28 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 17 052 | 949 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +83 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 18 |
| Latest release | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 | v2.1.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Nomad scores 76/100 against 57/100 for voidaccess, so it is the safer default.
Nomad ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for voidaccess.
If you want the quickest setup, Nomad is easier to run; voidaccess needs more configuration.
Nomad is growing faster right now (+83 stars in 30 days).
Nomad details →voidaccess details →
Swap a project
Keep Nomad, compare it with
Keep voidaccess, compare it with