NomadvsUmbraco CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Nomad | Umbraco CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #7 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 17 049 | 5 278 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +80 | +23 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 27 |
| Latest release | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | C |
Which one should you pick?
Nomad scores 76/100 against 71/100 for Umbraco CMS, so it is the safer default.
Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for Nomad.
If you want the quickest setup, Nomad is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.
Nomad is growing faster right now (+80 stars in 30 days).
Nomad details →Umbraco CMS details →
Swap a project
Keep Nomad, compare it with
Keep Umbraco CMS, compare it with