HiClawvsUmbraco CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HiClaw | Umbraco CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #7 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 886 | 5 278 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +223 | +23 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 27 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | C |
Which one should you pick?
Umbraco CMS scores 71/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.
Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for HiClaw.
If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.
HiClaw is growing faster right now (+223 stars in 30 days).
HiClaw details →Umbraco CMS details →