NomadvsQtap
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Nomad | Qtap | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #21 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 17 047 | 1 465 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +78 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 0 |
| Latest release | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | C |
Which one should you pick?
Nomad scores 76/100 against 51/100 for Qtap, so it is the safer default.
Nomad ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Qtap.
If you want the quickest setup, Nomad is easier to run; Qtap needs more configuration.
Nomad is growing faster right now (+78 stars in 30 days).
Swap a project
Keep Nomad, compare it with
Keep Qtap, compare it with