NomadvsPruneMate
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Nomad | PruneMate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #5 of 5 in Docker Management |
| GitHub stars | 17 049 | 468 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +80 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 10 |
| Latest release | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 | V1.3.3 · 15 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | HTML |
Which one should you pick?
Nomad scores 76/100 against 46/100 for PruneMate, so it is the safer default.
Nomad ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for PruneMate.
If you want the quickest setup, PruneMate is easier to run; Nomad needs more configuration.
Nomad is growing faster right now (+80 stars in 30 days).
Nomad details →PruneMate details →
Swap a project
Keep Nomad, compare it with
Keep PruneMate, compare it with