NomadvsOwncast
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Nomad | Owncast | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #1 of 4 in Live Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 17 051 | 11 631 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +82 | +78 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 3 |
| Latest release | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.3.0 · 2 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Nomad scores 76/100 against 73/100 for Owncast, so it is the safer default.
Nomad ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Owncast.
If you want the quickest setup, Owncast is easier to run; Nomad needs more configuration.
Nomad details →Owncast details →
Swap a project
Keep Nomad, compare it with
Keep Owncast, compare it with