NomadvsOpenWrt
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Nomad | OpenWrt | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #1 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 17 047 | 28 967 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +78 | +464 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 10 |
| Latest release | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 | v25.12.6 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Go | C |
Which one should you pick?
OpenWrt scores 83/100 against 76/100 for Nomad, so it is the safer default.
Nomad ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OpenWrt.
OpenWrt is growing faster right now (+464 stars in 30 days).
Nomad details →OpenWrt details →
Swap a project
Keep Nomad, compare it with
Keep OpenWrt, compare it with