actions-runner-controllervsOpenWrt
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| actions-runner-controller | OpenWrt | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 28 in CI/CD | #1 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 6 612 | 28 967 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +95 | +464 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 10 |
| Latest release | gha-runner-scale-set-0.15.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v25.12.6 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | C |
Which one should you pick?
OpenWrt scores 83/100 against 71/100 for actions-runner-controller, so it is the safer default.
OpenWrt ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for actions-runner-controller.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenWrt is easier to run; actions-runner-controller needs more configuration.
OpenWrt is growing faster right now (+464 stars in 30 days).
actions-runner-controller details →OpenWrt details →