NodeLinkvsStirling-PDF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| NodeLink | Stirling-PDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 14 in Audio Streaming | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 162 | 95 252 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 339 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 25 |
| Latest release | v3.9.0 · 14 Sept 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 50/100 for NodeLink, so it is the safer default.
Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for NodeLink.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 339 stars in 30 days).
NodeLink details →Stirling-PDF details →
Swap a project
Keep NodeLink, compare it with
Keep Stirling-PDF, compare it with