Node REDvsOctoBot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Node RED | OctoBot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 26 in Automation | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency |
| GitHub stars | 23 790 | 6 873 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 | +266 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 5 |
| Latest release | 4.1.17 · 21 Oct 2026 | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Node RED scores 81/100 against 69/100 for OctoBot, so it is the safer default.
Node RED ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for OctoBot.
If you want the quickest setup, Node RED is easier to run; OctoBot needs more configuration.
OctoBot is growing faster right now (+266 stars in 30 days).
Node RED details →OctoBot details →
Swap a project
Keep Node RED, compare it with
Keep OctoBot, compare it with