nocodbvsstatic_status
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| nocodb | static_status | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #24 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 65 370 | 732 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +316 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 0 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
nocodb scores 81/100 against 50/100 for static_status, so it is the safer default.
nocodb ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for static_status.
If you want the quickest setup, static_status is easier to run; nocodb needs more configuration.
nocodb is growing faster right now (+316 stars in 30 days).
nocodb details →static_status details →
Swap a project
Keep nocodb, compare it with
Keep static_status, compare it with