nocobasevsopenDCIM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| nocobase | openDCIM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #13 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 24 771 | 369 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +425 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 | 1 |
| Latest release | v2.2.36 · 29 Oct 2026 | 26.01 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0-only |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
nocobase scores 78/100 against 48/100 for openDCIM, so it is the safer default.
nocobase ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for openDCIM.
If you want the quickest setup, nocobase is easier to run; openDCIM needs more configuration.
nocobase is growing faster right now (+425 stars in 30 days).
nocobase details →openDCIM details →
Swap a project
Keep nocobase, compare it with
Keep openDCIM, compare it with