ActivepiecesvsopenDCIM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Activepieces | openDCIM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #13 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 25 269 | 369 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +550 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 40 | 1 |
| Latest release | 0.87.3-hotfix.1 · 29 Oct 2026 | 26.01 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0-only |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Activepieces scores 80/100 against 48/100 for openDCIM, so it is the safer default.
Activepieces ships more often: 40 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for openDCIM.
If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; openDCIM needs more configuration.
Activepieces is growing faster right now (+550 stars in 30 days).
Activepieces details →openDCIM details →