NezhavsRustFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Nezha | RustFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 10 377 | 35 504 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +45 | +1 772 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 40 | 5 |
| Latest release | v2.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | WTFPL | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
RustFS scores 74/100 against 72/100 for Nezha, so it is the safer default.
Nezha ships more often: 40 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.
If you want the quickest setup, Nezha is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.
RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 772 stars in 30 days).
Nezha details →RustFS details →
Swap a project
Keep Nezha, compare it with
Keep RustFS, compare it with