NewspipevsOmniVoice-Studio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Newspipe | OmniVoice-Studio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 94/100 |
| Rank in category | #32 of 85 in Feed Reader | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 498 | 93 286 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +58 012 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 35 |
| Latest release | v12.3.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 49/100 for Newspipe, so it is the safer default.
OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Newspipe.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; Newspipe needs more configuration.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 012 stars in 30 days).
Newspipe details →OmniVoice-Studio details →