NetworkOptimizervsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| NetworkOptimizer | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #17 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 1 210 | 89 717 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 428 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 | 17 |
| Latest release | v2.10.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C# | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 56/100 for NetworkOptimizer, so it is the safer default.
NetworkOptimizer ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for World Monitor.
If you want the quickest setup, NetworkOptimizer is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 428 stars in 30 days).
NetworkOptimizer details →World Monitor details →