netdatavszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| netdata | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 81 200 | 12 827 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +566 | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.12.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |
Which one should you pick?
netdata scores 87/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.
netdata ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
If you want the quickest setup, netdata is easier to run; zookeeper needs more configuration.
netdata is growing faster right now (+566 stars in 30 days).
netdata details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep netdata, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with