Navidrome Music ServervsUrocissa
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Navidrome Music Server | Urocissa | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 54 in Media Streaming | #11 of 19 in Photo Galleries |
| GitHub stars | 24 411 | 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +653 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 18 |
| Latest release | v0.64.2 · 23 Sept 2026 | 3.4.2 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Navidrome Music Server scores 80/100 against 48/100 for Urocissa, so it is the safer default.
Urocissa ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for Navidrome Music Server.
If you want the quickest setup, Navidrome Music Server is easier to run; Urocissa needs more configuration.
Navidrome Music Server is growing faster right now (+653 stars in 30 days).
Navidrome Music Server details →Urocissa details →