NATSvsOpenReader
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| NATS | OpenReader | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Message Broker | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 20 954 | 550 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +192 | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 19 |
| Latest release | v2.14.9 · 26 Oct 2026 | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
NATS scores 80/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.
OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for NATS.
NATS is growing faster right now (+192 stars in 30 days).
NATS details →OpenReader details →
Swap a project
Keep NATS, compare it with
Keep OpenReader, compare it with