OpenReadervsRabbitMQ
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenReader | RabbitMQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #3 of 12 in Message Broker |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 13 949 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +78 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 14 |
| Latest release | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
RabbitMQ scores 77/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.
OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for RabbitMQ.
RabbitMQ is growing faster right now (+78 stars in 30 days).
OpenReader details →RabbitMQ details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenReader, compare it with
Keep RabbitMQ, compare it with