nanotdbvsTimescaleDB
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| nanotdb | TimescaleDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 7 in Databases & storage | #5 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 141 | 23 773 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +195 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 19 |
| Latest release | v1.4.0 · 28 May 2026 | 2.31.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | C |
Which one should you pick?
TimescaleDB scores 77/100 against 44/100 for nanotdb, so it is the safer default.
TimescaleDB ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for nanotdb.
If you want the quickest setup, nanotdb is easier to run; TimescaleDB needs more configuration.
TimescaleDB is growing faster right now (+195 stars in 30 days).
nanotdb details →TimescaleDB details →
Swap a project
Keep nanotdb, compare it with
Keep TimescaleDB, compare it with