nanobotvsPeerTube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| nanobot | PeerTube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 49 589 | 15 375 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 035 | +43 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 13 |
| Latest release | v0.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
nanobot scores 82/100 against 75/100 for PeerTube, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, nanobot is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.
nanobot is growing faster right now (+1 035 stars in 30 days).
nanobot details →PeerTube details →