nanobotvsOrca
Two self-hosted AI Agents projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| nanobot | Orca | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 91/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 49 585 | 108 898 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 063 | +8 991 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 15 |
| Latest release | v0.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.4.243 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Orca scores 91/100 against 82/100 for nanobot, so it is the safer default.
Orca ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for nanobot.
If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; nanobot needs more configuration.
Orca is growing faster right now (+8 991 stars in 30 days).
nanobot details →Orca details →All AI Agents projects →
Swap a project
Keep nanobot, compare it with
Keep Orca, compare it with