Music AssistantvsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Music Assistant | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 59 in Music Streaming | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 3 252 | 56 869 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +144 | +140 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 45 | 5 |
| Latest release | 2.11.0b7 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 71/100 for Music Assistant, so it is the safer default.
Music Assistant ships more often: 45 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Typst.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; Music Assistant needs more configuration.
Music Assistant details →Typst details →
Swap a project
Keep Music Assistant, compare it with
Keep Typst, compare it with