Music AssistantvsOpenBrief
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Music Assistant | OpenBrief | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 59 in Music Streaming | #7 of 15 in Audio Processing |
| GitHub stars | 3 256 | 580 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +146 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 45 | 1 |
| Latest release | 2.11.0b7 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.4.0 · 25 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Music Assistant scores 71/100 against 45/100 for OpenBrief, so it is the safer default.
Music Assistant ships more often: 45 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OpenBrief.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenBrief is easier to run; Music Assistant needs more configuration.
Music Assistant is growing faster right now (+146 stars in 30 days).
Music Assistant details →OpenBrief details →
Swap a project
Keep Music Assistant, compare it with
Keep OpenBrief, compare it with