mumble-dockervsOpenReader
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| mumble-docker | OpenReader | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 16 in VoIP | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 380 | 550 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 19 |
| Latest release | — | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OpenReader scores 59/100 against 57/100 for mumble-docker, so it is the safer default.
OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for mumble-docker.
If you want the quickest setup, mumble-docker is easier to run; OpenReader needs more configuration.
OpenReader is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).
mumble-docker details →OpenReader details →